What undue humanitarian concerns? – Responding to Michael Roberts
Michael Roberts in an article published on Groundviews recently suggests that in the context of “an uncertain number of Tamil ‘civilians’ trapped within the beleaguered and shrinking LTTE territory…emotion and humanitarian concerns have eclipsed realism and factuality”. Are humanitarian concerns ever undue? In fact Michael’s position is lacking not only in ‘humanitarian concerns’ but also in ‘reality and factuality’. The objective of the proposed ceasefire is, surely, not to postpone the defeat of the LTTE (which will not help the LTTE or the trapped Tamil civilians) but to negotiate arrangements for urgent relief to those trapped and to facilitate the evacuation of those who wish to cross over (this would be the large majority of those trapped). Such arrangements, under international supervision, would greatly reduce civilian casualties and relieve suffering, i.e. serve humanitarian concerns. The World War II situations cited by Michael are of little relevance to the civil war in which we are caught up. Humanitarian concerns are relevant in…
Continue reading »



