Comments on: GENEVA-II & FOUR-LEGGED FURNITURE https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture Journalism for Citizens Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:55:59 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: nelum https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42344 Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:55:59 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42344 When will the powerlessness of the people end?

Not likely with this trend:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/85007346/A-List-of-Commissions-of-Inquiry-and-Committees-Appointed-by-the-Government-of-Sri-Lanka-2006-%E2%80%93-2012

A List of Commissions of Inquiry and Committees Appointed by the Government of Sri Lanka (2006 – 2012)

]]>
By: yapa https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42237 Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:28:53 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42237 In reply to nathan.

Dear nathan;

Considering the way of things happening under the guidance, direction and patronage of the “Ex-Allies” your post indicates that there is a justifiable reason to believe that Hitler too was misinterpreted and there is a worthwhile cause to revisit him.

Thanks!

]]>
By: nathan https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42227 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:50:52 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42227 In reply to Anpu.

And Hitler said, “Why are these hypocrites criticizing me? Look at what they do in the colonies!”

And the rest is history.

]]>
By: nathan https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42226 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:48:27 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42226 In reply to Anpu.

Zero last year. 8000 this year. 40000 next?

]]>
By: David Blacker https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42172 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:43:56 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42172 In reply to Nithyananthan.

And if you didn’t agree with my comment, it would not be sensible? I have seen enough comments against me on this and other blogs to understand that support has nothing to do with sense.

]]>
By: Burning_Issue https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42165 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:08:33 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42165 In reply to David Blacker.

Dear David Blacker,

“Dayan, regardless where the resolution is coming from, the LLRC was set up by the GoSL, and therefore its recommendations shouldn’t require external pressure to be implemented by the very government that called for a recommendation.”

Absolutely; I am not one of those Tamils who recklessly denounced the LLRC report though I had no faith that it would be meaningful during its tenure. I now recognise it’s significant and how it can help paving a way forward to forge a meaningful reconciliation.

Notwithstanding the importance of the LLRC and also it was sanctioned by the very regime that is dragging its feet; the overriding aspect in support of the implementation of its recommendations should be that, it is the right thing to do. This is what the people like Dr D.J has been asking for, for years. It should not be viewed as egocentric that it is a defeat at the hands of the Tamil Diasporas. In reality, if all the recommendations have been meaningfully implemented, the Tamil Diasporas lose their platform.

]]>
By: Burning_Issue https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42162 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:50:16 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42162 Dear Wijayapala,

“We already know what it feels like to be powerless. It lasted all the way up to 2009.”

It is rather a cheap point to make! The Tamils were powerless too during the LTTE time. You should recognise the role of the Sinhala Buddhist Chauvinists within the MR regime and how it is acting recklessly damaging the vision that you appear to ‘ostensibly’ aspire to achieve!

]]>
By: Mango https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42160 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:55:49 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42160 Dear Dr DJ,
How much longer do you think GoSL can carry on with the denial and obfuscation policy and simultaneously doing things like Ven. Gunawansa’s appointment to the Police Commission? When this motion is defeated, there’ll be another opportunity to corner GoSL at another UNHRC/periodic review session in. When the Iran sanctions kick in, the US only has to have a quiet word with Saudi Arabia and Sri Lankans will have to start using coconut oil as a petrol/diesel substitute.

Not implementing any of the LLRC’s recommendations seems like a is a perfect self-inflicted wound that even Sri Lanka’s friends will be unable to explain away.

]]>
By: Nithyananthan https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42158 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:41:54 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42158 In reply to David Blacker.

Wahoo! Amazing proposition and a timely admonition indeed! Something sensible I read from Mr. David Blacker after very long time. It’s a simple fact many among us ignore or fail to realize. Thanks, Nithy!

]]>
By: David Blacker https://groundviews.org/2012/03/04/geneva-ii-four-legged-furniture/#comment-42157 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:54:32 +0000 http://groundviews.org/?p=8765#comment-42157 Dayan, regardless where the resolution is coming from, the LLRC was set up by the GoSL, and therefore its recommendations shouldn’t require external pressure to be implemented by the very government that called for a recommendation. The external pressure is a result of the GoSL not showing any interest in implementing the LLRC recommendations, and simply using it as a cover. Similarly, just because the UNP supports the resolution, or even the pro-Tiger lobby, we should not oppose it when we know that the GoSL should follow the LLRC recommendations. It is the right thing to do.

If we do not like parts of the resolution, what we should be doing is participating in the drafting of such a resolution in partnership with the US, thereby arriving at a resolution that most will accept. That is if the GoSL is willing to accept a resolution that solely recommends an implementation of the LLRC report. Is it? To me it looks like it won’t even accept that, and I find that unacceptable.

Right now, we’re in a jam over the US fuel sanctions on Iran, and we need a possible exemption from it, and it hardly seems the moment to be antagonizing the US, given that we cannot ignore the fuel import ban the way India is doing, since we will lose the US garment market.

]]>