Comments on: The origins of the Media Accreditation Card https://groundviews.org/2008/01/03/the-origins-of-the-media-accreditation-card/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-origins-of-the-media-accreditation-card Journalism for Citizens Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:54:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: JM https://groundviews.org/2008/01/03/the-origins-of-the-media-accreditation-card/#comment-1419 Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:54:17 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2008/01/03/the-origins-of-the-media-accreditation-card/#comment-1419 There are proper journalists, accredited by the government, and then there are numerous others who pretend to be journalists for reasons extending from avoiding speeding fines (eg: my friend “I” who is a marketing manager at Art TV routinely pretends to be on his way to a meeting at the president’s house on behalf of CNN) to carrying out terrorist attacks.

The RLO members (Sinhala Koti) who were arrested and whisked away to boossa were not arrested because they were journalists, and being remotely connected to a railway union publication does not make them journalists. By the broad, all encompassing definition used by Sri Lankan NGOs as well as their foreign affiliates who should know better, anyone who’s ever had an article published in a newspaper, anyone who has a blog, and even anyone who’s a janitor at a printing press, is considered a journalist. These journalists, they seem to think, are exempt from having to obey the law and order of the country. According to them, the RLO members, purely on the virtue of being “journalists”, cannot be arrested even though there is clear proof of them receiving training from the LTTE, being in possession of a large quantity of arms, and confessing on national television to being responsible for several amateurish bomb attacks in and around Colombo. While all others need to have their national ID card in possession at all times, journalists should be able to get away with a press ID.

The ministers statement is a response to the accusation that 9 journalists have been killed in Sri Lanka last year. According to him, only one of them was a real journalist. If you think the minister is wrong, why not produce a list of these so called journalists, who they worked for, and why they were killed.

]]>
By: sam https://groundviews.org/2008/01/03/the-origins-of-the-media-accreditation-card/#comment-1418 Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:33:39 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2008/01/03/the-origins-of-the-media-accreditation-card/#comment-1418 Ideally, it should not the Government that issues a media card, but an independent media association or union. I personally believe that journalists should carry some kind of identification. This makes them accountable to the people they are questioning.

I would not want to be giving an interview to someone who verbally told me he/she was a journalist!

So, perhaps this media card should be issued by an editors association, or other appropriate body. Even freelance journalists can be issued with a card stating that is what they do.

It’s journalists who give the media a bad name, not the Government!

]]>