Comments on: One year of Mahinda Chintana https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=one-year-of-mahinda-chintana Journalism for Citizens Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:00:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: A Memory On Election Related Violence Valid Still Today | Colombo Telegraph https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-55651 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:00:28 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-55651 […] gratitude for bringing the 30-year war to an end, and to strengthen his mandate to continue his policies. A coalition of opposition parties offered former Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka as their […]

]]>
By: Kalai https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-438 Mon, 14 May 2007 03:19:50 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-438 , Donor dependence, distrubution of wealth and integration of communities outside of colombo into the formal economy, escalating conflict and increased stress this will place on the administration to fuel a sustainable offensive." The Government is doing what they want. This argument does not hold water. Inflation is on the rise, but do the voters care? See http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/5702 "Also, the language of the document does not really address the issue of devolution to the north directly, which will not bode well with the North." Lots of articles here on the SLFP proposals. Looks like war without any political process to me.]]> “Also, to be noted, the Chintanaya, was one, an election manifesto, not truly intended to be implemented, in a short time frame, an ideal, to move the mass, a strategy common to many democratic election campaigns.”

True, but then why claim it was the foundation of the SLFP proposals? I have even heard of MCGs instead of the UN’s MDGs!

“Secondly, implementation will bear a high cost, given the ‘culture of impunity’, Donor dependence, distrubution of wealth and integration of communities outside of colombo into the formal economy, escalating conflict and increased stress this will place on the administration to fuel a sustainable offensive.”

The Government is doing what they want. This argument does not hold water. Inflation is on the rise, but do the voters care? See http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/5702

“Also, the language of the document does not really address the issue of devolution to the north directly, which will not bode well with the North.”

Lots of articles here on the SLFP proposals. Looks like war without any political process to me.

]]>
By: raj https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-437 Sun, 13 May 2007 06:07:49 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-437 Also, to be noted, the Chintanaya, was one, an election manifesto, not truly intended to be implemented, in a short time frame, an ideal, to move the mass, a strategy common to many democratic election campaigns.

Secondly, implementation will bear a high cost, given the ‘culture of impunity’, Donor dependence, distrubution of wealth and integration of communities outside of colombo into the formal economy, escalating conflict and increased stress this will place on the administration to fuel a sustainable offensive.

Monitors are needed, but they won’t catalyze conflict transformation. Mahinda and Prabha, seem buckled down for war.

Also, the language of the document does not really address the issue of devolution to the north directly, which will not bode well with the North.

There is no trust between the parties, and the recent TAF strikes and SLFP proposals, don’t make matters any better.

]]>
By: nanda https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-436 Sat, 03 Feb 2007 03:22:33 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-436 Well well, dear Che and Sittingnut,

Are you reading news papers and do you watch TV news programmes in Sri Lanka or on what planet are you living. Nothing what I wrote has not been reported in the media. May be that the media is wrong? In that case I rest my case.

5 boys sitting on the beach shot death. Families make a police entry. They receive death threats. Familie has to move, become refugees in fear. Case transferred to another court in another city.

Women arrested and kept without charge

Man, and another, and another and yet more kidnapped in Colombo, never heard of since.

Must I go on?

Rule of law, judiciary, police improvements are all part of Mahinda’s Chinthana it is a serious document. It is the leading document for the present government and for its interactions with the people of Sri Lanka and with the donor community. A monitoring mechanisms needs to be in place in order to make sure the the promise of this document become reality. We will not get there by calling each other names.

]]>
By: groundviews https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-435 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:30:28 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-435 Che,

The point is simple – if all you wish to do is to “respond with what I think of her/his/its opinions”, there is no problem. The issue was with your previous comment was that only (seemed to) deride his / her / its name, with no effort made to engage with the opinions expressed.

Sittingnut’s response, which I have not published, would have taken this discussion into a wholly personal debate, without engaging with the post above.

Kindly note that this is a space governed by the Submission Guidelines (http://www.groundviews.org/submission-guidelines), put in place to avoid the hate speech, personal diatribes and bitter invective that have killed many online forums before, both in Sri Lanka and elsewhere.

]]>
By: Che https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-434 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:11:04 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-434 This is an atrocious and unconscionable attack on the freedom of expression. I come from a school of thought that believes that notwithstanding how odious (or as in this case politically incorrect) another’s views, one is prepared defend with one’s life, that person’s right to express them.

Same goes for ‘sittingnut’. However, I reserve the right to respond with what I think of her/his/its opinions.

A pity that Groundgviews cannot handle that.

]]>
By: groundviews https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-433 Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:20:53 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-433 Dear Che,

Your point is noted, but please keep in mind the submission guidelines here – http://www.groundviews.org/submission-guidelines – that call you. inter alia, to engage with the issues debated and not the monicker of the person, or his / her mercurial use of language, in comments on Groundviews.

This is with a view to avoid, as much as possible, the personal insults and diatribes that killed the early promise of initiatives such as Moju (www.moju.lk).

Thank you.

]]>
By: Che https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-432 Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:18:46 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-432 “sittingnut” ? – I rest my case.

]]>
By: sittingnut https://groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-431 Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:13:33 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/28/one-year-of-mahinda-chintana/#comment-431 author of this post seem to base all his/her comments from second hand observations and even mere speculation . words like ‘heard’ ‘reported’ without actually mentioning the sources are amply used. may be he or she should actually find the facts before posting.

for instance it would have been great to know the actual particulars of
“These underground dons were, however, not arrested but illegally eliminated while strengthening those underworld figures favourably to the present regime.”

as for the east he misses the most important thing. that large number of people there are now free of ltte. but may be he /she thinks that as a regression instead of a relief?

lets hope author improves the details in his/her posts in the future.

]]>