Comments on: New Recruits . . . https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=new-recruits Journalism for Citizens Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:42:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.1 By: foobar https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-331 Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:42:17 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-331 JustMal you are quite right – the Sunday Leader had this to say of the entire fiasco:

“…while wide publicity was given to Yoshita joining the navy with the sycophantic media carrying banner headlines on the President ‘donating’ and ‘gifting’ a son to the navy in November and December last year, in order perhaps to use him as bait for more recruits, it was not two weeks into his training that Yoshita, with none of the previous publicity hindering his progress, was surreptitiously shipped off to United Kingdom to follow a two year course in Dartmouth.

A spokesperson for the navy confirmed that Yoshita Rajapakse left the island to complete a two year course in Dartmouth. That means he will not see any fighting in the north and east for that period contrary to the hype generated through the media for political purposes.”

http://www.tamilcanadian.com/page.php?cat=527&id=4733

]]>
By: JustMal https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-330 Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:22:20 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-330 One of my class mates back in SL happened to be Mahinda’s nephew, and his dad was appointed the chairman of the Ports Authority when Mahinda took charge of that ministry back then. Politics for Rajapakses is a family business just as it had been so for other dynasties in Sri Lanka.

Your predictions were right. It seems that Yoshitha has already been shipped off to Blighty.

]]>
By: David Blacker https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-329 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:45:07 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-329 Jack, I’m sorry, but you’re being sillly. There’s been no precedent for such a thing to happen here, and it’s unlikely it ever will. What you just said has been said about several political families (the Bandaranaikas, the Jayawardenes, and the Premadasas). Only the former had any sort of a dynasty, and even then there was a large time gap between Mrs B and Chandrika. Such dire warnings were groundless where the other two families were concerned. Mrs B was only family member of a former politician to be fast-tracked. The others spent many years on the road and still haven’t got a sniff at the top job. Saddam was installed in a coup d’etat, and even then he didn’t get the prez’s job immediately. He had to knock his boss off first. There’s never been a coup in SL, and it’s unlikely to happen. As long as Sri Lankans still elect our leaders, there’s no such danger.

]]>
By: Yogan https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-328 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:53:34 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-328 I think it’s admirable what Yoshitha has done too.

]]>
By: Jack Point https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-327 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:33:48 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-327 This is just a part of Rajapakse’s big plan – he intends his clan to rule this country for many generations to come. The stage is being set now.

He himself will rule for 12 years and by the then the son should be ready. If he is not, a caretaker fron the family will keep the seat warm until the sons are ready.

One son will probably then hand over to the other.

I have been raeding a bit about Saddam Hussein’s background and Rajapakse seems to be shaping up on similar lines. Saddam was a deputy ruler for about a decade in the 1970’s and he then ruled for a further 20 as absolute ruler until depsosed in the American invasion. His brothers and half brothers plus an extended family/clan ran the country.

]]>
By: Des https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-326 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 05:32:23 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-326 Interesting discussion. If we look at those TV news clips where Prince William is passing out as a British army officer and think its a load of crap, then to hold a view that what the President’s son is doing is simply a propaganda drive to me would sound fine and non-contradictory.

However, I personally, am moved to admire the patriotism of the Brits when it comes to such activity and ceremony and how their royalty has also served in the military etc. While it glorifies the military and military solutions, and for that reason I wouldn’t mind seeing an end to the practice, maybe we can admire patriotism in itself.

If so, then where Sri Lanka needs to head is not for Sri Lankans to admire British patriotism and the practices of its royalty, but to admire the Presidents’ family and what happens here in our own country.

In that vein, I think what his son is doing is admirable.

If some Sri Lankans have to serve in the Army simply due to poverty, thats wholly unfair. Conscription, which is the model chosen by so many countries in similar situations would be the way to go forward.

If you feel you won’t fit into a Sri Lankan army where the majority are rural Sinhala-speaking rough-necks, well at least you will get a reality check as to who the majority of this country is, and feel more agreeable to accept your position as a minority in this country.

Justmal I didn’t understand your response. Were you saying that its okay for rural folk to be cannon fodder and not middle and upper class Colombo folk? If so at least your being honest about not wanting to be cannon fodder, so I can respect that.

]]>
By: Dark_Horse https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-325 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:59:52 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-325 Mandatory conscription is only going to bend the country more towards war. As David Blacker said only the select will be sent to the battle zones. Those with clout will be safe and sound.

It’s an unnecessary move for Sri Lanka. We aren’t Israel or Korea. Far from it.

Bringing it in will be true destruction for society here.

]]>
By: David Blacker https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-324 Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:41:58 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-324 t think mandatory conscription is a good idea" Course not. You'd have to come back and fight those nasty Tamils you hate, eh?]]> “I don’t think mandatory conscription is a good idea”

Course not. You’d have to come back and fight those nasty Tamils you hate, eh?

]]>
By: JustMal https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-323 Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:36:43 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-323 I don’t think mandatory conscription is a good idea. If it’s cannon fodder that they need, they shouldn’t have much difficulty finding what they want in the villages and hamlets full of unemployed working class young men and women – especially women.

It’s quite obvious now that the government believes in a military solution, at least as far as the East is concerned. Perhaps they want to completely clear the East, go for provincial council elections, and then have negotiations on the North.

]]>
By: David Blacker https://groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-322 Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:09:23 +0000 http://www.groundviews.org/2007/01/10/new-recruits/#comment-322 On the subject of “greener grass” and “higher studies”, these don’t necessarily need to be exemptions from conscription if the law is handled smartly. For example, in Israel and South Korea (both heavily dependent on conscript armies), all citizens within the conscript age group MUST serve. If abroad, they must return within a set period or face penalties. What is more likely is that there’ll be corruption within the system that will enable the ‘select’ to avoid fighting.

One thing that must also be remembered is that the biggest opposition to conscription comes from within the military itself.

]]>