Engaging issues of caste – the forbidden subject

Image courtesy Wikipedia

Caste is observed by the overwhelming majority of Sinhalese and Tamils but the subject remains virtually taboo in public discussions. If it is mentioned in public, it is often either to hurl abuse or to negotiate a marriage. The latter is because for many of us caste is the most important factor in marriage. The former is because caste is yet widely accepted as a measure of social status; the latter because for many caste is the most important factor in marriage, even more important than character. I am not suggesting that the individuals should be identified by caste but I do think that the subject should be freely discussed as is done in India, although caste oppression there is much more severe than in Sri Lanka.

Representatives of every identified caste (and tribe) participated in the framing of the Indian Constitution and detailed provisions were made for reservations for untouchable castes and tribals in recruitment to the Public services and in elections to political institutions, notably in the National Assemblies at the Union and State levels. All this was steered through by the Chair of the drafting committee appointed by the ruling Indian National Congress, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, the leader of the Dalits (Untouchables). In due course, reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) were also provided for. To limit the multiplication of reservations, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the total of all reservations should be less than 50%. The current position is 15% for Dalits, 7 ½ % for Tribals (Scheduled Tribes) and 27% for OBCs, adding up to 49 ½ % reservations.

Indian Hindus can cite their scriptures, especially the Manu Smrithi (Laws of Manu) codified two millennia ago to legitimate caste and gender oppression. We in Sri Lanka have absolutely no Scriptural justifications to observe caste. There is no caste in Buddhism, Islam or Christianity. Even Hindus in Sri Lanka, whatever their ancestry, have lost their high caste status by moving outside the boundaries specified in the Manu Smrithi. These boundaries are virtually those of India. In practice, losing caste on account of travel outside India is virtually defunct. When Gandhi went to England for his Barrister’s course in the 19th Century and returned to India, he had to go through an elaborate religious ritual to regain his caste status as a Vaisya. But when he went out again in the 20th Century he had lost his belief in the caste system and opted against observing that ritual. Today, with frequent international travel undertaken by those of high caste resident in India, and with very large numbers of high caste Hindus permanently resident outside India, that practice has been virtually abandoned; so too several other sections of Manu Smrithi, but the scripture as a whole has not been formally repudiated by the orthodox Hindu leaders. It remains available for selective / opportunistic citation and observance.

Scriptural justification apart, a fundamental difference between the caste structures in India and Sri Lanka is the contrast in numerical proportions. In India the three high caste categories (Brahmin, Kshathriya and Vaisya) together total 17.6% of the entire Indian population, the Dalits constitute 15.8% and the Scheduled Tribes 7.8 percent (1981 Census). Pre independence, the political leadership of India was exclusively high caste, primarily Brahmin and Kshathriya. But India achieved universal adult franchise roughly about the same time as Sri Lanka (1931). Thus, despite the continuing deep seated caste prejudice, Brahmin-Kshathriya political dominance was not viable. In recent decades India has had Muslim and Dalit Presidents. It appears that the next Prime Minister may be a Shudra. In contrast in Sri Lanka both among the Sinhalese and Tamils, those who claim to be high caste (Govigama among the Sinhalese and Vellala among the Tamils) are also the most numerous. Both among the Sinhalese and the Tamils Govigama and Vellala elected political dominance has continued and remains difficult to dislodge. The one exception is, as many claim to be, the exception that proves the rule. He was from a caste that was so insignificant as to be dependent on Govigama backing and non-threatening to Govigama domination.

Soon after I assumed duties as Government Agent and District Secretary of Jaffna in 1981, I was met by a delegation from the most depressed of castes in Jaffna (Valluvar, also referred to as Parayah). The head of the delegation was a school teacher who was and remains a family friend through successive generations. The delegation claimed that 30% of the population of Jaffna is of “untouchable” castes, but there proportion in the public service is negligible on account of discrimination in admissions to good schools and in recruitment to the public services. Even if future recruitments is unbiased, progress may be painfully slow. They wanted quotas in recruitment to the public services.

I informed them that while I agree with the facts as set off by them the remedy they wanted was outside my authority. Moreover, the remedy would carry serious ill-effects. First, a district-wide caste census would be required to establish the appropriate caste proportions. This will involve the caste identification of every person in Jaffna and the issuance of caste specified ID cards. Second, every advertisement to recruitment to the public services would need to specify the caste composition of the recruitment. Third, every applicant would need to reveal his or her caste identity backed by the caste specific ID card. Fourth, every personal file in every office would need to specify the caste identity of the person concerned. All this would reinforce caste consciousness and also generate a backlash from non-beneficiaries of the quotas. For the untouchables the net impact may be negative.

I suggested an alternative – a succession of socio-economic development projects targeted to benefit those from specified “untouchable” castes. I secured the approval of the District minister and the Chairman DDC for such a course. Socio-economic upward mobility will gradually undermine caste prejudice and disabilities. The caste group targeted in the first year would be the Valluvars, and the projects selected for them was silk weaving in a village populated exclusively by those of that caste. I secured the cooperation and funding from the Chairman of the Export Development Secretariat, Mr. Santhiapillai, to get down a silk weaving expert from India. He explored Jaffna and selected village of Madduvil on grounds of both caste and weaving expertise. Since Jaffna’s climate is unsuitable for mulberry plantations, arrangements were made to get down silk yarn from the South. This arrangement had the further advantage of involving North-South cooperation. The project was an instant success. At the wedding of my cousin Prof. Jeevan Hoole soon afterwards, he and many of the guests were dressed exclusively in high quality Madduvil silk. Unfortunately the interruption of yarn supply on account of the 1983 pogrom terminated the project. It needs to be re-established.

The ‘untouchable’ caste group selected for the project following year were tree climbers and the project was a Palmyra arrack distillery of substantial size located in Thikkam. Since there was no other distillery of that kind anywhere, I secured the help of my cousin, Wim Gunasegaram (a mechanical engineer) and a few coconut arrack distillers from the South. All this was offered free of charge. Again, there was good North-South cooperation. Earlier, during the height of the Palmyra toddy season prices dropped very low, undermining the income of the tappers. The new distillery at the village of Thikkam worked overtime during that season and helped to sustain toddy prices and income levels. The quality of the output was adequate for the local market, and the arrack sold out quickly. I made an attempt over a decade later to secure the help of a major liquor firm to both upgrade the arrack to gain an international market and also to produce an array of other products (various liquors) but I did not receive the co-operation of senior officials. This project too needs to be upgraded to internationally accepted levels.

The third year’s project, to be located in Vathiry near Point Pedro, was to benefit another major ‘untouchable’ group, leather workers. Again Mr. Santhiapillai, Chairman Export Development Corporation initiated arrangements, the plan was to get down a leather expert from Italy to train local leather workers to turn out a range of footwear and other leather products of international quality for the local market as well for export. Unfortunately, the 1983 pogrom intervened and the project had to be abandoned. Since Vathiry has very many leather workers and a very long tradition in this field this project has much promise and needs to be revived. I had several other projects in mind, some of them caste related and the others related to the local expertise and comparative advantage that Jaffna enjoyed (e.g. the cultivation, marketing and processing of fruits) but I am no longer in a position to help beyond making some suggestions.

Before I conclude I will digress to refer to the well established similarity between race and caste prejudice and the respective codes, by quoting from my book, Discrimination With Reason?, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp 18 & 19.

The system that replaced slavery had the essential features of a caste system, including something close to the concept of “untouchability”. Many occupations were assigned to one ethnic group or the other. Members of the ‘lower’ ethnic group were excluded from college education. There was enforced segregation in public and private life, with some provisions for members of the ‘inferior’ ethnic group to function as domestic servants in the households of the other. Punishment for breach of the rules governing segregation was asymmetric with respect to the two groups.

Miscegenation was a serious offence for which punishment was asymmetric in respect of both race and gender. There was some laxity in respect of sexual relationship between ‘high caste’ (White) men with ‘low caste’ (Black) women. In contrast, sexual relationships between ‘high caste’ (White) women and ‘low caste’ (Black) men often resulted in the lynching of the latter and some kind of ‘excommunication’ of the former. Even the slightest proportion of ‘inferior’ group blood was sufficiently contaminating for that person to be relegated to the ‘inferior’ category.

‘Nigger’ was a widely used term of abuse, comparable to the use of the term ‘pariah’, the name of a ‘Dalit’ caste in Tamil Nadu. If a White person was likened to a Black, legal consequences could follow. Calling a White person a Negro was an actionable defamation in the South; placing a White person in a negro railroad car was an actionable ‘humiliation’ (Black 1960; 426-7; Magnum 1940) in law and in practice the two groups were separate and thoroughly unequal’.

Finally, I never had illusions that any or all of the projects that I had in mind would significantly undermine the caste system in the near future. The system had developed over the millennia and had been sustained by Hindu scriptures and traditions. It has also deeply penetrated in to the Buddhist and Christian traditions in Sri Lanka. For example, the clergy of the two premier Buddhist chapters are exclusively Govigama and, in the absence of vigorous protests from among the Buddhist clergy and laity, this situation seems likely to continue. The top political Sinhalese/Tamil leadership is also predominantly, and seemingly durably, Govigama/ Vellala. Even among the Christians, caste has been and perhaps continues to be a significant factor even in the election and appointment of Bishops. What caste subversive socioeconomic development projects can do is to decrease the correlation between caste and economic status. It has been well established that upward socio-economic mobility over a long period can raise caste/race status and eventually weaken caste/race hierarchy. My objective was more to help to change attitudes leading to long term impact on caste oppression than to seek to close disparities in the short run.

  • Kula Sigha

    I doubt very much if “caste is observed by the overwhelming majority of Sinhalese” TODAY.

  • esaroha

    very nice article with a lot of good information.

  • jiva parthipan

    Devanesan Nesaiahs article and its analysis of caste and other Indian/Sri Lankan ideas are typical of orientalist- missionary- colonial conceptions of Hinduism and far removed from reality.
    Shruti – Solely of Divine origin
    Vedas, Upanishads,Brahmanas,Aranyakas
    Smritiis are located in time and space. Therefore each time and epoch has diffrent Smirits . Smirti is customary law. This changes in every epoch and therefore one finds many Smritis
    When writing ‘laws’ the colonial establishement couldnt find a a HIndu code of law. there fore it elevated a little known Smriti which was only valued in some regions in India to make “HIndu Law.
    Therefore much of Nesiahs analysis is pretty futile.
    Cate is a sociological phenomenon of South Asia. Budshist, Christians, Muslims all have caste

  • jiva parthipan

    Shruti can always override Smriti. The present Smriti of HIndus in India is the HIndu law of India that has nothing to do with Manus Smriti. The present Smriti is the HIndu law that was drafted by the British

  • KSKumar

    First, it is an informative article. We need to discuss the topic in the open as well as educate the children that we are all human beings and we need to be treated equally. This means that we need to start teaching the children from Grade 1 that all of us are the same.

    Next, we also need to practice equality in our day to day life: for example, opening our doors to the so called “low caste” people, who are essentially our brothers and sisters.

    Then, there is no spiritual justification for the caste system in Hinduism. The Bhagavd Gita talks about four varnas and specifically states that no one becomes a Brahmin by birth but becomes a Brahmin only by leading a dharmic life.

    Therefore, it is our duty to educate the ordinary citizen that everyone is equal and also practice what we teach

  • jiva parthipan

    There is no caste…
    There is gotra (m), varna (m), jati, class are interchangebly used to denote caste. Whilst in truth they are separate systems which intersects at times. One needs to understand sociological pehenomena correctly. Lumping things together as ‘caste’ does disservice to critique, dissect or approve a phenomena. ‘Caste’ merely remains a polemic: purely a missionary/colonial construct which says less about ‘caste’ or for that matter HInduism but more about the missionary-colonial edifice.

    jati and gotra are social constructs that got muddled up with varna, which was probably otherwise a theoretical and purely spiritual concept.