From mass grave to cemetery: Questioning the claims in Mannar

Various explanations have been offered by Government officials around the discovery of skeletal remains in Mannar some months ago.

The BBC reported in January that a government medical official overseeing the excavation, Dhananjaya Waidyarathne, said the bodies had been buried in layers and that he was “very much worried” (sic) that no signs of clothing or human-made artefacts had been found in the mass grave. The skeletal remains of 83 – women, men and children – have been found on the site. As The Republic Square notes, Government authorities originally suggested that it was the result of an LTTE massacre in the region that was controlled by the Tamil separatists for a long period and a police spokesman had also averred that the bodies could be the result of a malaria epidemic in the region in the 1930s.

On 9th March, excavations at the site stopped. In a report to Reuters, Senerath Dissanayake, Director General of the state-run Archeological Department said it is not a mass grave as the bodies had been “buried systematically”.

“These are about 50 years old. It is a grave yard. Even our officers can identify and see the cut marks of the graves. We have found 83 skeletons so far and we will stop (excavation)from tomorrow,” he told Reuters.

This revelation was given wide publicity in the State media, including in the Daily News newspaper, which on 10th March noted on its front page that,

The Commissioner’s announcement comes in the wake of various elements trying to point the finger at government forces following the discovery of what is now confirmed to be a normal graveyard.

MG1011

The Daily News goes on to report that Dr. Dissanayaka said that “This spot was a cemetery that was in existence between 1940 to 1953” and that senior research archaeologists Namal Kodithuwakku and A.A. Wijeratne had also come to the conclusion that the location was a very old burial ground.

In this context, Groundviews was sent the survey plan for the area, conducted in February 1955.

MG1012

Click for higher resolution image. The area marked in yellow is where the burial site was discovered, and the excavations conducted.

MG1014

MG1016

P.Plan S 677 of Thirukethiswaram Village, does not record the existence of any cemetery during the time of the survey, or before. The lots in the area are explained in detail in the official survey documents from 1954, 1955 and 1961.

MG1017

MG1018

MG1019

MG1020

MG1021

Click for higher resolution images. Groundviews was informed that opposite Lot 32 there was, until it was destroyed during the war in the late 80’s, an R.D.A. Circuit Bungalow and at some point of time, there had also been a co-operative store on the same lot. While this can be contested or dismissed as incorrect or partial recollection, Lot 32, the present day burial site, is only noted as featuring high jungle and a masonry well in the official survey general’s documents. Adjacent lots also show no record of a cemetery or burial grounds.

The claims by the Archeological Department are thus somewhat suspect. Unless Dr. Dissanayaka and the Archeological Department can far more accurately prove their assertion that this site was indeed a cemetery and all the skeletal remains are carbon-dated to around the time the land was used as such, it is unlikely those calling for more robust and independent investigations into the Mannar mass grave will be satisfied or silenced.

  • Jack Poiny

    Good work.

  • tell me the truth

    does the archaeo dept think they can pull the wool over the eyes of the public by making claims which can be easily contested. Are they not worried about their credibility and integrity as a responsible institution? or are they being intimidated by the state just as the Dept of Census?

  • James Chance

    Excellent work – thanks to whomever sent you the maps.

    What I find interesting are the conflicts in the stories that originally emerged from different government figures around the 7th, 8th and 9th of March. On Saturday 8 March, there was a story from AFP that quotes the JMO D. Waidyaratne (whom by all accounts was doing a professional job of the excavations until forced to stop) saying this:

    “We have gathered skeletal remains from upper layers and grouped them into 81 boxes,” Waidyaratne told AFP. “These remains were in a mass grave buried in a haphazard way compared to the properly laid out graves we found at a depth of two metres.” He said forensic tests were being done in respect of the 81 groups of skeletal remains to establish the cause and time of death. “It is quite possible that these people were buried over the old cemetery and we need further investigations,” Waidyaratne. “This process is going to take a lot of time in the laboratory.” [http://news.yahoo.com/sri-lanka-mass-grave-over-old-burial-083811786.html]

    Here the JMO accepts the government line that there could be an old cemetery under the bodies originally escavated, but maintains clearly that this doesn’t call into question the existence of the mass grave.

    The Daily News story you cite came out two days later. I have not seen a story since that quotes Dr. Waidyaratne.

  • http://www.groundviews.org/ Groundviews

    The skeletons unearthed at Thiruketheeswaram in Mannar were reportedly of bodies buried since the 1930’s, further it is not a mass grave site as earlier believed, but an ordinary cemetery, the Archeological Department Director General said today.

    Via http://www.dailymirror.lk/news/45632-mannar-mass-grave-an-ordinary-cemetery-dg.html