Barack Obama: History’s High Note

History sometimes hits a high note, sweet and soaring, clean and clear, as if from Satchmo’s horn. The most intelligent, interesting and inspirational of contemporary political personalities is about to be the President of the most powerful nation on the planet.

Reading Obama
The publisher’s notes on the back cover of his second book sketch him with bare adequacy: “A Senator and a lawyer, a professor and a father, a Christian and a skeptic…” By his words, ye shall know him. To understand him, you have to encounter his words, written and spoken. Three layers of Barack Obama are revealed almost archeologically or geologically in his two books and recent speeches.

The first book written in his mid-thirties is the most brilliant in literary terms. An existential search for himself, it covers the USA, Asia and Africa in a journey both outwards and inwards, through ideas and cultures, stages of growth and states of mind, chronicling an evolution of a personality with unflinching transparency. He does so with a grasp of writing that makes his personal passage an exciting odyssey for the reader. Clearly here is a young man who could have been a great American author but chose the vicissitudes of public service and political life instead.

His second book picks up at a point where he has evolved and matured, settled but not stagnated. Though it has been called his second autobiography, it is only partly and secondarily so. Like the first book it is also a story of a journey; the chronicle of a traveler. This is an aspect of Obama that will remain part of his spirit even when he has entered the White House, and I expect it to be noted in the diaries he will keep and the post-Presidential autobiography he will write, which will be such as that of no other.

This second book, the better known The Audacity of Hope, a work written when he has come home, found his centre, is a book of ideas, the evolution of a political programme and philosophy through personal encounter, political experience and intellectual reflection. His literary gift remains, surer if less scintillating. The chapter in which he discusses the troubled question of ensuring growth with equity, exploring but eschewing antinomies of a low growth welfare statism and high growth capitalist cannibalism, and charting the contours of a New Deal for a new century (and a new crisis), is book-ended by a description of how comfortable it is to ride on a private jet – a privilege of US Senators— and a realization of the stories, the social and human perspective, you miss while doing so.

The book picks up from where he left off in the first, tells us of his experiences as a Senator, reflects on the deeply flawed nature of contemporary American political life, discusses the broad thematic issues and problems from abortion to race and religion that confront and divide the USA, explains his late and lucid conversion to Christianity despite his atheist father (born a Muslim), skeptic mother and non-religious grandparents, and sets out his distinctive views on world affairs and national security strategy. (He studied international relations at Columbia).

Obama has a capacity which he has honed into a technique, of slipping inside the skin of an idea or a person, working it through to its conclusion, reliving its strengths, seeing its weakness or opposite side especially when taken to an extreme, acknowledging and contextualizing that too, and then offering up his own third position which is a synthesis when possible and a middle path when not. He does so while being able to combine the styles of higher journalism with political thinking. In the midst of one chapter he has roughly 15 pages reconstituting the spirit of the Founding Fathers and the Constitution and ending with Lincoln and the anti-secessionist war, which is the best text of political thought I’ve read in recent times. In The Audacity of Hope this self-confessed student of political philosophy (and self-censored poet) has produced a model of political writing, a progressive democratic manifesto and charter for America but of relevance also for the world.

The third layer of Obama is the most visible and audible one: his spoken word and style, in speeches, TV appearances and at public forums. In him George Washington meets Denzel Washington. He has been compared with John F Kennedy, but to me he is more reminiscent of Bobby Kennedy in 1968 (perhaps refracted through the prism of a Poitier performance), with his ability to reach across race and class, to inspire passion for change yet calm the passion for destruction.

He also combines a searching self with self confidence, and that self confidence with off beat self-deprecatory humor.

Obama as Leader
“Better is not good enough” opines Obama. Can Barack Obama be a great President? Yes, he can. The main problem he will face is the contradiction that he has referred to in passing in his writing, that between “power and principle” or as Yale University’s new book by my former teacher John Kane calls it, “Between Virtue and Power: The Persistent Moral Dilemma of US Foreign policy”. This will be the issue in Afghanistan and the border areas of Pakistan.

Obama’s intellectuality and sensitivity must not obscure his tough mindedness and realism, his “fierce ambition” (inherited from his father, he says) and commitment to “what works”, which he identifies in the foreign policy realm as “the marriage of Wilsonian idealism with hard headed realism”. In his second book he re-iterates one thing that makes him tick: every man tries to live up to his father’s expectations or avoid his mistakes. In constituting his final criterion, this motivator will, I believe, be conjoined with his conscience. That is where he will confront his toughest problem: Israel/Palestine, which envenoms America’s relations with the vast Islamic world. If true to himself Barack Obama cannot but wonder whether the Palestinian is the new Black. It will probably be Barack Obama’s second term before he is confident enough to tackle the problem of Israel/Palestine in a way that is firm, fair and feasible.

Obama wants to generate “fundamental change” (as he put it at his final election meetings) in the USA—Michelle Obama calls this goal “a different kind of democracy”. He also wants to “change the world” and “heal the planet”. Given his multiple roots and experiences, and his understanding of himself, his goal of change cannot but be global. Sitting at the apex of the US power structure he will have the global reach, the instruments with which to make these changes, but he will also learn the constraints which prevent him from doing so. More than anyone else, Barack Obama has the qualities needed to transform the awesome power of the USA into a source and resource for global good rather than for hostility, harm and humiliation. With the elimination of the factors of bad leadership and policy and the substitution of the best possible in both realms, we could see the USA at its best. We shall also see it for what it objectively, systemically, is: with Obama at the helm, if the US fails to change its propensity for world domination while fulfilling its vocation for leadership, then “the old anti-imperialist cant” (as he dismissively dubs it) will stand validated.

The global Obama effect
The most powerful post in the world has just been won, not on the basis of ethnicity but going against the grain of ethnic majoritarianism, on the basis of excellence. This will simultaneously shed light on and raise the bar of achievement for every single society: can we say the same about ourselves? Can a Barack Obama make it to the top in our country? And why not? How far or high up can he or she get? What would it take to change that? While the walls of Jericho — of parochialism, bigotry and chauvinism — may not crumble at the sounds of Obama’s oratory, ethnic and cultural chauvinists and fundamentalists the world over will find themselves on the wrong side of History. Whether they realize it or not, they are, as Barack Obama said of John McCain and the Republicans, “out of ideas and almost out of time”

Obama and History
Obama’s education and life experiences acquaint him with a far broader set of concepts and cultures, ideas and theories, situations and voices (some contained within himself) than anyone who has run for the US Presidency in a long time. (How many of them had read Fanon?) His natural tendency will be to be a great teacher, reformer and reconciler on a global scale; to be a planetary ‘change agent’, leaving the world better than he found it. His wife Michelle will be the most educated, intelligent, articulate and progressive-minded First Lady anywhere and is likely to have a global impact herself. If anybody will be speaking “truth to power” in an Obama administration, it will probably be this First Lady – that’s in addition to the inner dialogue going on within Barack Obama.

Never in my lifetime has a man with a more highly evolved sensibility been elected to the highest office anywhere in the world, let alone in the most powerful country of all.

Eventually the light breaks through.

  • nagalingam

    Yep. Well said. A precise and eloquent analysis of the man and his books. I have listened to him and others about him for an year now. A new era for the US and hopefully for the world. I wonder how long it would take for such a statesman to take the political stage in Sri Lanka.

  • punitham

    If and when we have the audacity of courage to tell all our school children what has been happening in the last sixty years without the slightest distortion, I believe many Obamas would emerge.

  • http://javajones.wordpress.com Java Jones

    Great analysis. What do you think Obama will feel about the prevailing governance and leadership here in Sri Lanka?

  • http://- Justin

    Dr Martin Luther King made possible a person of the calibre of Obama into presidency of the USA. We should all be not judged by the colour of our skin and ethnicity but by the contents of our character.

    Then we can have an Obama

    I am sure all the present popliticos will end up in dumps.

  • http://msn Velu

    Why just sixty years? that shows. There is more to history (if important) than 60 years. So youve git things to hide, we know. Now claiming to be the victim!! Like the sheapers crying wolf, the world knows its cries without much substance. The false feeling of superrority created as a minority over the majority and the sick doubble standard expression and pleasure you derive is the scourge of what is limiting people like you and the exploitation of the ignorrent (wanni peasents and baby army).

    Remember Obamah is for a unified state, he speaks for and as a US citizen not a sessionist, seperstist, terrorist or a racist ! The US is not engaged with a fascist or terrorist or separatist war on it’s soil. After all if it is justified here then so can it be in the US. America is facing the minority impact in its political future for the first time. Sri Lanka has faced this for many decades. It is onle now that a quarter of the voting population is non-european, and this change is not bought or forced upon the US by out siders / a third party. Our situation is on the other hand has been quite different to this.

  • reka perera

    US is a federal state and Tamils were humiliated psychologically and physically
    for decades for asking for federalism.

  • reka perera

    30s and 40s saw overtones of majoritarianism and we formed a pan-Sinhala cabinet in 1931. When Tamils were hesitant about accepting the constitution at independence, our DSSenanayake pleaded with them saying ” We will be fair to you.” There was anti-Muslim riots in 1915 in the South.
    All school children should be taught the history of the last 100 years and the future Sinhalese politicians will make better choices with the international humanitarian and human rights standards.